HAMMEL V. STATE FARM: 3 ZUNIGA DECLARATIONS: "k. The failure of State Farm to evaluate either of these
claims within a shorter time period was a direct result
of a company policy that was implemented in approximately
1993. This policy was applied to this case based on the
fact that the State Farm appraisal of the damage to the
Stoliar vehicle was less than $500.00, even though
State Farm knew that the actual damage to the vehicle
exceeded $1,000.00. Pursuant"
(click link for complete article)
A Collection of News, Blogs, & Websites about the Corporate Bully & Abuser State Farm Insurance
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LINKS
- STATE FARM SUCKS FACEBOOK GROUP
- STATE FARM SUCKS DELICIOUS.COM
- STATE FARM SUCKS MIXX.COM CHATTER
- STATEFARMSUCKS3 ONEFORTY.COM
- STATE FARM SUCKS SOUP.IO
- STATE FARM SUCKS POSTEROUS.COM
- STATE FARM SUCKS LIVEJOURNAL.COM
- STATE FARM SUCKS BEBO.COM
- STATE FARM SUCKS TUMBLR.COM
- STATEFARMSUCKS2 FRIENDFEED
- STATEFARMSUCKS3 FRIENDFEED
- STATE FARM SUCKS BRIGHTKITE
- STATE FARM SUCKS USE.COM
- STATE FARM SUCKS MYSPACE
- STATE FARM SUCKS MYSPACE BLOG
- STATE FARM SUCKS GOOGLE PROFILE
- STATE FARM SUCKS STATUS.NET
- STATE FARM SUCKS IDENTI.CA
- STATE FARM SUCKS NETWORK BLOGSPOT
- STATE FARM SUCKS BLOGSPOT
- STATE FARM SUCKS
No comments:
Post a Comment